Petition against East Sussex Council’s Get A Grip Campaign

East Sussex Council’s approach is an example of the widespread and growing level of misunderstanding around attendance policy.

We support Ella Lewis and the thousands of parents in East Sussex who have signed her petition calling for East Sussex Council to withdraw their “Get A Grip” campaign on school attendance.

East Sussex Council’s approach is an example of the widespread and growing level of misunderstanding around attendance policy.

Most Headteachers, attendance staff and Council officers have the humanity and professionalism to understand the individual needs of pupils and their families. Sadly though, parents across the country are increasingly reporting examples of schools and academies making appalling decisions, particularly for children with special educational needs, illness, disability, mental health and anxiety, and for families dealing with sad, difficult or complex issues, or simply just struggling to get by.

We are urging local and national politicians, education professionals and Council officials to look closely at the real evidence around attendance, to genuinely listen to parents, to investigate the impact their decisions are having on children and families and to think very carefully about the culture of coercion they are creating. To assist this, we are in contact with East Sussex Council to understand the drivers behind their campaign and their concerns. We aim for a constructive dialogue to facilitate a more complete understanding of the issues faced by pupils and parents and a more productive approach to our shared aims of improving outcomes for all children.

Further research needed

Decisions around attendance at national, local and school level are being made on an incomplete and misunderstood evidence base. The Parents Union is calling for further research in this area, and is actively seeking partners to assist.

Key misconceptions

In the meantime, these are some of the key misconceptions we come across daily:

1. “Every day in school impacts on attainment”
This is not true. To quote the Department for Education:
“the Department has not claimed a causal link [between attendance and attainment] ….absence ‘can’ (rather than ‘will’) affect GCSE performance…” (our bold).
Attainment – that is, exam results – is a result of many complex factors, including child physical and mental well-being, parental support, mutual respect between school and families and the quality of teaching.

Analysis of the statistical links between attendance and attainment show that in some cases there is positive correlation between absence and attainment in that certain levels of absence for certain reasons are linked to higher exam results (see same reference below). The reasons for this have not been researched but it indicates that there are far stronger elements at play in a child’s attainment than just turning up to school.

If there is a causal link, there is no evidence as to the direction of that link – children with low attainment may be less likely to attend.

In summary, it is entirely possible that attendance is a proxy for a range of factors including parental social capital, support for the school, and pupil experience and motivation. Focussing on attendance figures in a way which has a negative impact on underlying, stronger variables is risks producing counterproductive results.

2. The Supreme Court ruling on Jon Platt means children have to be in school at all times

The Court effectively said parents who take their children out of school without authorisation are open to be issued with a Truancy Penalty Notice. The ruling did not change Headteachers’ ability to use their discretion to authorise absence. It said nothing to justify any change in policy on absence for illness. It’s not illegal to be ill.

The 1996 Education Act, section 444 3b clearly states: ”The child shall not be taken to have failed to attend regularly at the school by reason of his absence from the school: …..(b) at any time when he was prevented from attending by reason of sickness or any unavoidable cause…”

3. Schools can ask for medical evidence for all absence for reasons of illness

Again, not true. Government guidelines state: ‘‘Code I: Illness (not medical or dental appointments) Schools should advise parents to notify them on the first day the child is unable to attend due to illness. Schools should authorise absences due to illness unless they have genuine cause for concern about the veracity of an illness. If the authenticity of illness is in doubt, schools can request parents to provide medical evidence to support illness. Schools can record the absence as unauthorised if not satisfied of the authenticity of the illness but should advise parents of their intention. Schools are advised not to request medical evidence unnecessarily. Medical evidence can take the form of prescriptions, appointment cards, etc. rather than doctors’ notes.” (our bold)

BMA Guidelines specifically state ”It should be noted that GPs do not provide sick notes for schoolchildren. When children are absent from school owing to illness, schools may request a letter from a parent or guardian, and this is no different during an exam period…”

4. Ofsted…..

Ofsted have said:

“One of the main considerations during an inspection is the impact of any steps that a school is taking to promote and encourage regular attendance by all pupils. When we inspect schools, parents have the opportunity to register views about their child’s school. Inspectors will consider this as part of the evidence in arriving at judgements about the school. If there is evidence that a school’s procedures are not in accordance with any statutory guidance issued by the Department for Education, inspectors will consider this as part of an inspection. Ofsted makes no recommendations about the manner in which schools should promote and secure good attendance and punctuality.”

Schools and academies set their own attendance targets. Ofsted have confirmed that they judge a school against its own targets. Schools and academies requiring medical evidence for all illness should bear in mind that this is not in line with any statutory guidance issued by the Government. Equally those who feel they have no choice about a draconian approach to attendance should be mindful of the risk such an approach will pose to parental feedback during Ofsted inspections.

5. Attendance Awards

Parents are reporting rewards schemes for 100% attendance levels on an individual and class level. We ask Headteachers to rethink such schemes, bearing in mind this response from Ofsted’s Special Adviser for SEND, Matthew Barnes to a question on award schemes: “The issues with the policies that you have suggested are being adopted is that they do not reflect the Equalities Act. The act would require schools to amend their policies to reasonably adjust for children’s needs when they have a medical condition. It’s simple really. Take the child out of the stats when comparing classes, or give the awards for having the lowest numbers of unauthorised attendance. After all, if a school is authorising an absence, it should not count against any child.”

We appreciate and thank all those Headteachers and education professionals who understand real life and who treat our children as individuals. We urge them to stand together with parents against the “Get A Grip” campaign.

Support our campaign

If you would like to support our campaign for further research on the attendance issue or to give your feedback on how effort can be better focused for those families and children who need help most, please contact us or email us at theparentsunionuk@gmail.com.

3 thoughts on “Petition against East Sussex Council’s Get A Grip Campaign”

  1. Well written and well understood.
    ❤️ CHILDREN COME FIRST ❤️
    Fully support The Parents Union in their endeavours to change the mindsets of:
    The Government
    The Educators
    OFSTED
    Head Teachers
    Local Authorities

  2. As a parent of a disabled child in East sussex I know first hand what it’s like to have a child out of school for nearly 2 years due incompetence and the need to save money by ESCC.
    I fought to get adequate schooling but does anyone hold ESCC accountable while they allow our disabled children to be uneducated for all that time. NO. They delay every decision and take everyone to SEN tribunal to save money and fail to mention these children. They aren’t attending school due to ESCC but all they do is blame parents for wanting a school that knows something about their INDIVIDUAL disabilities. Our SEN children are “left to it” by the very council that is using such a disgraceful campaign.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *